| |
Cutaneous lymphomasM. Alaibac, E. Tonin, A. Peserico, C. Veller-Fornasa |
||
|
Keywords
cutaneous lymphomas; T cell; B cell; classification; immunophenotyping; immunogenotyping; review |
Summary
The term primary cutaneous lymphomas designates a heterogeneous group of lymphoproliferative disorders arising from skin-homing T and B cells. The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) classification for primary cutaneous lymphomas recognizes a limited number of cutaneous T-cell lymphomas and cutaneous B-cell lymphomas and provides a working classification for cutaneous lymphomas. Herein, the diagnostic procedures for the diagnoses of cutaneous lymphomas are discussed. Recent developments regarding immunophenotyping and immunogenotyping of cutaneous T- cell lymphomas and cutaneous B-cell lymphomas recognized in the EORTC classification are presented. |
| |
|
The term primary cutaneous lymphomas designates a heterogeneous group
of lymphoproliferative disorders arising from skin-homing T and B cells
which present in the skin with no evidence of extracutaneous disease at the
time of diagnosis and six months thereafter (1-3). They are after the group
of gastrointestinal lymphomas the second most common group of extranodal
non-Hodgkin lymphomas with an annual incidence of 1-1.5/100,000. ClassificationThe European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Classification
(EORTC) uses a combination of clinical, histological, immunophenotypic, and
molecular biological characteristics and provides a working classification
for cutaneous lymphomas (Table I) (4). The diagnosis of cutaneous lymphomas
is made by recognizing the clinical manifestations and is supported by laboratory
tests. Immunophenotyping (immunologic analysis of cellular antigen expression)
and immunogenotyping (molecular biology analysis of antigen receptor genes)
support the conventional clinical and histopathologic analyses. Immunophenotyping of cutaneous lymphomasThe distinction between cutaneous lymphomas and non-lymphoid tumors of the skin is a common problem. The most useful immunohistochemical marker in this situation is the CD45 antibody reacting with all the known isotypes of the CD45 family, also called the leukocyte common antigen family (LCA family). The antibody labels the cell membrane of almost all leukocytes and is absent on non-haematopoietic cells (5). Mycosis fungoides is a neoplasm of T helper lymphocytes expressing
the CD4 molecule and the pan-T-cell antigens CD2 and CD3 (1). They generally
express the T-cell receptor molecules that consist of ? and ? chains (TCR??)
(6). Partial or complete loss of the T cell associated antigens CD5 and CD7
can sometimes be observed particularly among the intraepidermal T cells and
in the late stage of the disease (7, 8). This aberrant phenotype is considered
circumstantial evidence of a neoplastic proliferation of T-cells. A small
percentage of cases express CD8 rather than CD4. Benign reactive cutaneous
diseases such as chronic eczema and psoriasis show the same pattern as that
in early stage of mycosis fungoides (9). However cutaneous infiltrations in
early mycosis fungoides contain significantly more CD4+ cells than those
of benign lymphoid disorders. The CD4/CD8 ratio has been shown to be 4/1
in benign lymphoid infiltrates, 7/1 in the patch stage of mycosis fungoides,
14/1 in the plaque stage of MF and 24/1 in the tumor stage (9). Patients may have atypical lymphocytes with cerebriform nuclei (Sezary
cells) in the peripheral blood. The current practice is to use a criterion
of at least 20% cerebriform lymphocytes to define Sezary syndrome (10).
Immunophenotypic studies of the peripheral blood may show expansion of a
CD4+CD7- population reflective of circulating atypical lymphocytes (10).
Primary cutaneous large T-cell CD30+ lymphoma is the most common
form on non-MF primary CTCL. The spectrum of primary cutaneous CD30+ lymphoproliferative
disorders includes lymphomatoid papulosis, primary cutaneous large T-cell
CD30+ lymphoma and intermediate forms (11). Lymphomatoid papulosis is characterized
by scattered CD30+ blast cells whereas primary cutaneous large T-cell CD30+
lymphomas demonstrate diffuse infiltrates of large anaplastic CD30+ T cells
(11, 12). The CD30 molecule is expressed on the majority (>75%) of neoplastic
cells. Most cases express the CD4+CD30+ phenotype with variable loss of pan-T
cell antigens (CD2, CD3, CD5, or CD7). A small minority of cases is CD8+CD30+(12).
Primary cutaneous large T-cell CD30- lymphomas are characterized
by minimal or absent CD30 expression (11, 13). Tumor cells express a phenotype
of the CD4+ lymphocyte subset. Occasional cases express CD8. Primary cutaneous pleomorphic small/medium-sized T-cell lymphomas
are characterized by deep and diffuse infiltrates composed of small-to-medium
sized atypical lymphoid cells expressing the CD4 molecule (11, 14). CD8+
cutaneous pleomorphic lymphomas are rarely observed. A small minority expresses
the ?? TCR and is characterized by an aggressive behavior. The loss of one
or more pan-T antigens (CD2, CD3, CD5, or CD7) can be observed. Primary cutaneous B-cell lymphomas are characterized by a dense infiltrate
of tumor cells expressing B-cell surface antigens, notably CD19, CD20, CD22
and CD79a (15, 16). Neoplastic cells may be Ig+ or Ig-. Ig+ B-cell lymphomas
are monoclonal, ie, all tumor cells express the same Ig light chain, either
? or ? (15). This phenomenon is denominated light chain restriction. Reactive
polyclonal B-cell infiltrates are composed of a mixture of ? and ? cells,
tipically with approximately 2.:1 ? predominance. Therefore, the presence
of light chain restriction is consistent with the presence of a CBCL. Table 1. EORTC classification for primary cutaneous lymphomas.
Immunogenotyping of cutaneous lymphomasThe use of molecular biologic techniques has improved our ability
to diagnose lymphocytic infiltrate of the skin and provided additional diagnostic
parameters to complement clinical, histologic and immunophenotipic analysis.
Molecular characterization involves the identification of a monoclonal population
of lymphocytes which is based upon the detection of specific rearrangements
in the genes coding for antigen receptor in B-cells (Ig) and T-cells (the
T-cell antigen receptor) (16,17). Southern blot analysis of genes coding
for Ig or for T-cell receptor was the method used in initial studies, which
showed evidence for the monoclonal nature of both cutaneous T cell lymphoma
(CTCL) and cutaneous B cell lymphoma (CBCL). More recently, Southern blot
hybridization has been challenged by the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for
the routine analysis of clonality (18). Studies of clonality by means of PCR in patients with MF revealed
clonal patterns in tumorous lesions, in erythrodermal stages, and in most
infiltrated plaques, whereas a dominant clone was not found in 40% of non-
infiltrated patch lesions (19-21). The immunogenotyping studies of primary cutaneous CD30+ lymphoproliferative
disorders have shown the clonal T-cell nature of these disorders (11). In
particular the TCR gene rearrangement analysis of lymphomatoid papulosis,
which is characterized by a clinically benign course, has shown evidence
of monoclonality in the cases analyzed (22). A similar monoclonal pattern
has been observed in the other subtypes of CTCL, notably primary cutaneous
large T- cell CD30- lymphomas and primary cutaneous pleomorphic small/medium-sized
T-cell lymphomas (11). Immunogenotyping studies in CBCL have shown in most cases a monoclonal
process; however, they differ from nodal lymphoma in that they rarely show
the t (14,18) translocation (23-25). Since polyclonal patterns of TCR and immunoglobulin rearrangements
were found in most benign inflammatory dermatosis one might argue that the
molecular demonstration of clonal proliferation of lymphocytes provides strong
evidence for malignancy. However recent studies have shown monoclonality
in patients with benign cutaneous lymphoid infiltrate (18). These results
indicate that monoclonality is not conclusive evidence for malignancy and
that results from clonality studies should be interpreted in the context
of histopathological, immunohistochemical and clinical data. |
|
| References |
|
|
|
| Author's
address |
|
Mauro Alaibac, MD, PhD, Clinica Dermatologica,
Universita di Padova, Via C. Battisti 206, 35100, Padova, Italy Elena Tonin, MD, resident, same address Andrea Peserico, MD, professor of dermatology, same address Cleto Veller-Fornasa, MD, professor of dermatology, same address |
|
| Homepage | Current issue | Prev. article | Next article |